![]() Win-Win if you have a GPU which meets the minimum spec. In the case of DXO anyone with a "decent" GP, DXO recommend a Nvidia 1060 or equivalent as their minimum have found DeepPrime not only gives them superior but also faster results than PRIME. Using the GPU is going to only increase going forward as it represents the best opportunity to increase the computing power available. I could get equivalent process times for a D850 file using Topaz Sharpen AI in Stabilise mode using a 9 year old i3820 CPU as a guy using a 24 core AMD Threadripper CPU we both had the same Nvidia 1060 6Gb GPU :-) So upgrading my GPU had turned out to be a good investment. In some ways it can be considered a bonus. I will upload the full res jpgs to the site in the original post. 4x faster than the processing in Topaz Denoise 3. On my setup with older mid-range graphics card (GeForce 1060GTX), the export in DXO (using GPU) is ca. Since Topaz only does denoise, you still need another program for the rest 2. With CPU power having plateaued a few years ago software companies are harnessing the power of the GPU. Leaving Topaz at the default settings led to blocky looking artifacts with patches of noise and no noise (recover details slider fixes it), and DXO slider is generally the 'safer' of the three where it's harder to brutalize the image, but with it I also prefer modest settings. My take (only comparing DeepPrime functionality vs Topas Denoise) 1. No problem if you only use Adobe software. There have been a number of threads over on an Amazon owned review site :-) It looks like if you specced your computer to only work with Adobe then the issue is people skimped on the GPU. It is always an issue when your software exceeds the capabilities of your hardware. Not everyone is getting the improved noise reduction results as DXO though :-) Maybe useful for the odd special occasion, but FORTY times slower than Capture One ? I'm very impressed by the quality of the noise reduction and the overall quality of the end results, but why is it so very, very SLOW. Quote from: Rhossydd on November 08, 2020, 05:38:15 am It's an interesting convertor certainly. *Affinity time is a little different as exporting is a two stage process, once to 'develop' the file then export to file format. Switching to CPU only reduces time by about 10s on DeepPrime.įorce it to use the gpu (even though not fully supported) and it drops to 57s so a massive improvement, if still much slower than the competition. The times above are with 'auto' performance selected as a preference. It looks like the huge times are down to the DeepPrime processing. I use DxO PL4 and the Topaz products and also tested DxO PureRaw out of curiosity. Time for exporting a Canon 5Div file here (Win 10 3.9ghz i7, 32gb ram, SSD drives, nvidea GTX750 gpu)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |